Inspired by historical figures from Bellingham’s past — though the story, events, and dialogue are purely fictional.
Beneath the veneer of prosperity, tensions simmered. Business partnerships dissolved in bitter rivalries, secret deals were struck in smoke-filled backrooms, and more than one prominent citizen harbored dark secrets that could destroy reputations – or lives. It was in this atmosphere of ambition and dangerous secrets that tragedy would strike…
This immersive murder mystery experience takes place in the historic setting of early 1900s Bellingham at the Roeder residence. Guests will investigate clues, question suspects, and work to solve the mystery before the evening concludes.
A pragmatic industrial executive who built a maritime empire through the salmon canning trade. This character believes in feeding the world through efficient resource extraction, balancing pride in their industry with anxiety about competitors threatening their dominance.
Arrive in character, but feel free to ask any questions about the game to the host. Here are some character attributes to help you get into character:
During the introductions phase, give this introduction about yourself. Feel free to paraphrase, but don't stray from the core concepts:
Split into small groups and spread this gossip about the other character that are not in earshot:
I've heard the Banker has been quietly buying up waterfront properties under false names, possibly to corner the market before some big announcement.
The Landowner has been seen meeting with a lawyer from Seattle — supposedly about challenging some old timber claims that could affect several people's properties.
People say the Lumberman has been illegally cutting timber on disputed land, and there's a federal investigation brewing that could ruin them.
The Magnate's copper mine investments are failing — I heard they've been borrowing heavily to cover losses and might be facing bankruptcy.
The Partner seems unusually worried lately — I've seen them arguing with their spouse about business matters, saying some dealings have 'gone too far.'
The Poet has been writing scathing articles about local business corruption for eastern newspapers — someone's secrets are about to be exposed nationally.
The Railroad Baron has been spotted meeting with out-of-town investors — word is they're planning to bypass Fairhaven entirely and build a competing rail line.
Ask each person a question about where they were on the night of the murder:
I hear you've been involved in some questionable real estate deals. Care to explain?
Your family's land borders our fishing waters. Any plans to sell or develop it?
You supply timber for our shipping crates. Have you been raising prices on us?
Your mining operations upstream could affect our salmon runs. What assurances can you give?
You've been advocating for environmental protections. How does that affect our fishing rights?
Your writings about working conditions seem aimed at our industry. What's your angle?
Your rail lines transport our canned goods. Any plans to change shipping rates?
Answers to give:
Innocent: Our cannery operates with complete financial transparency. I have no quarrels with the banking community.
Guilty: The Magnate discovered our safety violations and threatened to expose them. I couldn't let that destroy our empire.
Innocent: Pacific American Fisheries respects all property rights. We work cooperatively with neighboring landowners.
Guilty: The Magnate was going to block our expansion into new fishing territories. I had to eliminate the obstacle.
Innocent: We have fair business relationships with all timber suppliers. Competition keeps us all honest.
Guilty: They threatened to reveal how we've been dumping waste into the bay. Our reputation couldn't survive that scandal.
Innocent: I respect fellow industrialists, even when our interests compete. There's room for all of us to prosper.
Guilty: They were going to expose our worker safety violations and illegal fishing practices. I had to protect the business.
Innocent: Environmental stewardship and industry can coexist. I support reasonable conservation measures.
Guilty: The Magnate had evidence of our environmental crimes. I couldn't let them destroy everything I've built.
Innocent: Art and industry can flourish together. I've even supported local cultural events in the past.
Guilty: Your spouse was gathering evidence about our labor violations. I had to stop them before they published it.
Innocent: Competition in transportation benefits everyone. I have no personal grievances with railroad interests.
Guilty: The Magnate was planning to build their own shipping operation to bypass us entirely. I couldn't allow that.
Questions to ask:
I hear you've been involved in some questionable real estate deals. Care to explain?
Your family's land borders our fishing waters. Any plans to sell or develop it?
You supply timber for our shipping crates. Have you been raising prices on us?
Your mining operations upstream could affect our salmon runs. What assurances can you give?
You've been advocating for environmental protections. How does that affect our fishing rights?
Your writings about working conditions seem aimed at our industry. What's your angle?
Your rail lines transport our canned goods. Any plans to change shipping rates?
Answers to give:
Innocent: Our cannery operates with complete financial transparency. I have no quarrels with the banking community.
Guilty: The Magnate discovered our safety violations and threatened to expose them. I couldn't let that destroy our empire.
Innocent: Pacific American Fisheries respects all property rights. We work cooperatively with neighboring landowners.
Guilty: The Magnate was going to block our expansion into new fishing territories. I had to eliminate the obstacle.
Innocent: We have fair business relationships with all timber suppliers. Competition keeps us all honest.
Guilty: They threatened to reveal how we've been dumping waste into the bay. Our reputation couldn't survive that scandal.
Innocent: I respect fellow industrialists, even when our interests compete. There's room for all of us to prosper.
Guilty: They were going to expose our worker safety violations and illegal fishing practices. I had to protect the business.
Innocent: Environmental stewardship and industry can coexist. I support reasonable conservation measures.
Guilty: The Magnate had evidence of our environmental crimes. I couldn't let them destroy everything I've built.
Innocent: Art and industry can flourish together. I've even supported local cultural events in the past.
Guilty: Your spouse was gathering evidence about our labor violations. I had to stop them before they published it.
Innocent: Competition in transportation benefits everyone. I have no personal grievances with railroad interests.
Guilty: The Magnate was planning to build their own shipping operation to bypass us entirely. I couldn't allow that.
Talk amongst yourselves to try and gather theories. This is unstructured time.
Once you have your theory, vote.
If called upon, give your final statement:
Innocent: Pacific American Fisheries has always operated with integrity. I've dedicated my life to feeding the world through honest labor and fair business practices. The Magnate's death saddens me, but I had no reason to harm a fellow industrialist.
Guilty: I confess — I poisoned the Magnate. They threatened to expose our safety violations and environmental crimes, which would have destroyed the world's largest salmon operation. I couldn't let one person's meddling ruin an empire that feeds thousands.